Google want to fix Android update
Breaking news: Android upgrades are still truly moderate. The most recent numbers put the seven-month-old Android 6.0 Marshmallow at only 7.5 percent of gadgets. That is a normal of a little more than one percent for every month, so on the off chance that this keeps up, by 2020 the larger part of gadgets will be perfect with Marshmallow or higher. Awesome. Google's most recent endeavor at settling Android's overhaul issue supposedly includes "a rundown." On this rundown, OEMs are positioned by how quick they convey upgrades, which the report says is utilized to "highlight proactive makers and disgrace late merchants." Google has even pondered making this rundown open.
Does anybody think this is going to work? Will "disgrace" truly be the main thrust behind inspiring organizations to overhaul? We'd envision "making the rundown open" would mean presenting it on a site—is that truly going to rival the a great many dollars these organizations spend on promoting?
Fans and individuals who do look into in advance will definitely realize that most OEMs and bearers have horrendous upgrade notorieties, so what business sector will this truly be tending to? It's the mass market that truly needs this data—the general population that stroll into a Verizon store to purchase "the new Galaxy" that they saw on TV. These individuals won't see Google's "accomplice disgracing" list. The rundown will have no force if nobody pays consideration on it, and shy of an enormous (and improbable) promoting push by Google, nobody will.
Marshmallow's present appropriation rate for dynamic gadgets, and a trendline normal of the most recent couple of months of redesigns. We'll arrive sometime in the not so distant future.
Google continues overlooking what's really important with regards to tending to Android's redesign circumstance. It keeps concocting techniques to make upgrading "less demanding" for OEMs, yet I don't think the issue is "simplicity of overhauling"— it's making any motivating force for OEMs to redesign by any means. Google assumes that its accomplices will redesign telephones since it's The Right Thing To Do by their clients and that distributing gold stars will send them scrambling to deliver upgrades for their gadgets. I don't feel that is always going to happen.
Further Reading From 2014: The condition of Android redesigns: Who's quick, who's moderate, and why
Naming and disgracing (some of the time adulating) the redesign endeavors of OEMs and transporters.
Google entirely attempted the "disgrace" strategy and it didn't work. At the point when Google claimed Motorola, Moto's overhaul speed experienced the rooftop. Motorola was accomplishing close Nexus-like redesign paces on a considerable lot of its telephones and was certainly putting different producers to disgrace. In any case, the expanded upgrade rivalry never truly impelled different OEMs to begin contending on redesign speeds.
Googlerola was additionally a sign that OEMs don't generally think about "simplicity of redesigning" either. Part of the whole Motorola activity was to indicate different OEMs how it's done and give an outline on the most proficient method to separate Android while not upsetting the center OS so much that overhauling got to be troublesome. By separating in applications, minimizing discretionary changes to Android, and working with bearers, it figured out how to give an almost Nexus-like redesign pace. This has been replicated by absolutely zero OEMs. Profound changes to the OS are still made, pointless reskinning of each picture asset still happens, overhauls still take upwards of three months. Google gave an incredible lesson with Motorola yet nobody was tuning in.
Begin talking the OEMs' dialect (the dialect is cash)
All that really matters is that Android accomplices just think about, well, the primary concern—cash. These organizations as of now have your cash, so overhauling a gadget that is as of now been sold is an unnecessary cost. There's likewise a decent contention to be made that upgrading a gadget harms future deals. On the off chance that your telephone isn't overhauled, it will begin to feel old, so will probably purchase another telephone sooner.
Further Reading From 2012: The checkered, moderate history of Android handset upgrades
We take a gander at which OEMs and cell transporters may leave your handset a stranded block.
On the off chance that Google truly needs to alter Android's overhaul circumstance, it needs to begin working with Android accomplices and make it really justified regardless of their while to redesign. We've heard reports that Google imparts promotion income to its accomplices—if a client purchases a Verizon Samsung telephone, performs a Google hunt, and taps on an advertisement, Verizon and Samsung get a bit of that advertisement income. Thus, punish accomplices by lessening or dispensing with that income sharing in the event that they don't push out upgrades. On the off chance that an OEM surpasses the bend and stays up and coming, build the measure of income sharing. Debilitating to move the stock cost of an OEM by influencing its main concern is the atomic choice—and, people, we're at the point where the atomic choice is all that is cleared out.
I don't believe it's an insane proclamation to say "organizations principally think about cash," and we question there is any proof out there that demonstrates giving predictable upgrades to your clients enhances the main issue. Beyond any doubt it will gain an organization the admiration of lovers, however that market most likely isn't sufficiently enormous to move the needle much. We think straightforwardly paying accomplices by means or the like of layered framework would be a decent approach to stand out enough to be noticed. Google would at long last begin talking their dialect, the dialect of cool, hard money.
Not at all like Google's overhaul rankings, a private alcove bargain additionally has the advantage of influencing each client similarly paying little respect to the amount of examination they do before the buy. Android accomplices would be incentivized to upgrade rapidly, since consistently they don't overhaul is one more day of lost advertisement income. It would push them to redesign the most famous gadgets initially, since those would have the most noteworthy offer of advertisement snaps. We likewise can't envision that it would cost Google a ton more cash subsequent to, recall that, it is as of now doing this. We're simply recommending it join a layered framework to the promotion offer model.
As it sta